|18 Jul '08|
SCOTTISH NATIONAL STANDARD BEARER:Peter Dow
FOR FOSTOK'S SAKE!
Banned terror leader broadcasted by the BBC
Gavin Esler, another wayward Scot who like Kirsty Wark, is interviewing terrorists, contrary to my "Standard Bearer" advice. "Put that shite out!" Hey, Gavin, there is a war on and I am telling you it is your patriotic duty to stop with the terror propaganda!
25th July 2007 - at it again. Newsnight welcomes back banned London 7/7 bomber-in-chief, Fostok.
The BBC - "The British Broadcasting Corporation" so-called but they aren't on Britain's side. With friends like the BBC, Britain doesn't need any enemies - because the BBC will give every assistance to Britain's most dangerous enemies.
Like this enemy of Britain - Omar Bakri Mohammed/Fostok - barred from Britain in 2005 as a dangerous terrorist leader now brought back to inspire more terror, more bombings in Britain, all thanks to a broadcast feed of Fostok from outside Britain and broadcast on BBC 2 Newsnight.
Have the rules of the game really changed?
How hollow Blair's words sound now. "The rules of the game are changing" Blair said. Clearly, however, the BBC are insisting on the old rules - if they want to broadcast terrorists they that's exactly what they will do - to hell with any new rules! They've stuck two fingers up to Blair and they don't consider that Brown will enforce any new rules.
With the new Prime Minister, the BBC are misbehaving in a similar way as do pupils, with a new teacher, misbehave to see how far they can go. So it is time to discipline the BBC harshly and treat them like the wilful little brats that they are.
Now to be fair to the courts, there was one court case this month when the first ever people were jailed by the UK for running pro-terror websites.
Good news, but did the BBC publicize the news about that court case much? No, they didn't. I had to find out about it on American TV ABC World News re-broadcast on late night BBC News 24.
Why didn't the BBC publicize that story themselves more? Because that might put impressionable people off becoming terrorists?
Why did the BBC broadcast the terrorist leader Fostok again, knowing his support for terror? To encourage impressionable people to become terrorists?
It is an absolute outrage that the foolish and treacherous people who are running the BBC are allowed by the government to do so.
If the rules of the game had really changed then the BBC Newsnight editors, journalists and management would be heading to be prosecuted for broadcasting Fostok and they'd be fined or jailed and sacked.
It shouldn't matter if Fostok didn't say anything too obviously in favour of terrorist suicide bombing of London on Newsnight on that occasion. Fostok is known as a supporter of terror and merely to have him broadcast as a pretend "legitimate" contributor to any political debate is giving his support for terrorism undeserved status and is boosting terrorism.
This is a reckless deed by the BBC but, after all, it is exactly what I would expect from an utterly incompetent UK state - they've allowed terrorism to grow before and the UK royalists will keep terrorism thriving unless they are stopped.
If Brown's government does not come down on the BBC like a ton of bricks then that is simply one more reason to add to the growing list of reasons to have Brown impeached and removed as Prime Minister.
The very fact that Brown should be entertained as Prime Minister by the Queen in the first place, when his continuing failure should have been easy to predict after his loyalty to all Blair's failures, is yet another reason to get rid of the monarchy.
The monarchy allows a rotten government which allows a rotten BBC which allows terrorism to gain support. So the monarchy allows terrorism - it is as simple as that.
Wrong Blair. The rules of the game are still the same – idiots are still in charge.
Click to the Political leadership forum article -
View Scottish National Standard Bearer Forum