FOR FOSTOK'S SAKE!

Banned terror leader broadcasted by the BBC

Gavin Esler, another wayward Scot who like Kirsty Wark, is interviewing terrorists, contrary to my "Standard Bearer" advice. "Put that shite out!" Hey, Gavin, there is a war on and I am telling you it is your patriotic duty to stop with the terror propaganda!

25th July 2007 - at it again. Newsnight welcomes back banned London 7/7 bomber-in-chief, Fostok.

The BBC - "The British Broadcasting Corporation" so-called but they aren't on Britain's side. With friends like the BBC, Britain doesn't need any enemies - because the BBC will give every assistance to Britain's most dangerous enemies.

Like this enemy of Britain - Omar Bakri Mohammed/Fostok - barred from Britain in 2005 as a dangerous terrorist leader now brought back to inspire more terror, more bombings in Britain, all thanks to a broadcast feed of Fostok from outside Britain and broadcast on BBC 2 Newsnight.

Have the rules of the game really changed?

How hollow Blair's words sound now. "The rules of the game are changing" Blair said. Clearly, however, the BBC are insisting on the old rules - if they want to broadcast terrorists they that's exactly what they will do - to hell with any new rules! They've stuck two fingers up to Blair and they don't consider that Brown will enforce any new rules.

With the new Prime Minister, the BBC are misbehaving in a similar way as do pupils, with a new teacher, misbehave to see how far they can go. So it is time to discipline the BBC harshly and treat them like the wilful little brats that they are.

Now to be fair to the courts, there was one court case this month when the first ever people were jailed by the UK for running pro-terror websites.

Good news, but did the BBC publicize the news about that court case much? No, they didn't. I had to find out about it on American TV ABC World News re-broadcast on late night BBC News 24.

Why didn't the BBC publicize that story themselves more? Because that might put impressionable people off becoming terrorists?

Why did the BBC broadcast the terrorist leader Fostok again, knowing his support for terror? To encourage impressionable people to become terrorists?
52 innocent people died in the London 7/7 bombs. How many more innocent people do the BBC want to see die?

It is an absolute outrage that the foolish and treacherous people who are running the BBC are allowed by the government to do so.

If the rules of the game had really changed then the BBC Newsnight editors, journalists and management would be heading to be prosecuted for broadcasting Fostok and they'd be fined or jailed and sacked.

It shouldn't matter if Fostok didn't say anything too obviously in favour of terrorist suicide bombing of London on Newsnight on that occasion. Fostok is known as a supporter of terror and merely to have him broadcast as a pretend "legitimate" contributor to any political debate is giving his support for terrorism undeserved status and is boosting terrorism.

This is a reckless deed by the BBC but, after all, it is exactly what I would expect from an utterly incompetent UK state - they've allowed terrorism to grow before and the UK royalists will keep terrorism thriving unless they are stopped.

If Brown's government does not come down on the BBC like a ton of bricks then that is simply one more reason to add to the growing list of reasons to have Brown impeached and removed as Prime Minister.

The very fact that Brown should be entertained as Prime Minister by the Queen in the first place, when his continuing failure should have been easy to predict after his loyalty to all Blair's failures, is yet another reason to get rid of the monarchy.

The monarchy allows a rotten government which allows a rotten BBC which allows terrorism to gain support. So the monarchy allows terrorism - it is as simple as that.

Anjem Choudary is a terrorist-propagandist who is at war with the British nation Well I listened to this guy, Anjem Choudary, “Former” UK Head of Al Muhajiroun, on BBC News 24, 8th August 2005 (HARDtalk with Stephen Sackur). Clearly, Choudary is wily propagandist for the Al-Qaeda-inspired terrorist war against the British people (and presumably, the Scottish people), whom he hates, apparently. This BBC broadcast of his supporting propaganda in favour of the terrorist bombings of London on 7th July 2005 is further evidence - - that he and his friends are at war with the British people, and - that they have had support from the UK state that continues today.

Terrorist propaganda on the BBC, 8/8/05

Again it strikes me as strange that while those waging war against the British people are allowed to broadcast terrorist-war propaganda on BBC TV, on the other hand, I, a British patriot, was recently detained for trying to display a Union flag, the British national flag, during a 2 minute silence for the victims of the London bombings! So the UK state is helping Britain’s enemies while hindering Britain’s patriots! Due entirely to their extremely stupid and counter-productive actions, the BBC, the police and the courts are, some of the time, supporting the terrorists in their war against the people of Britain and yet they still wonder why Britain has been bombed!

BBC: Blair vows hard line on fanatics Anjem Choudary and the other terrorist-propagandists should be urgently yet humanely detained until such time as the war on terrorism is won.

True patriots like myself should be given protection from the stupid oppressive actions of the idiot officers of the UK state. People must wake up to the fact that they have been badly served by the UK state, from the Queen and the Prime Minister on down, who have allowed terrorism to flourish while ensuring that freedom fighters like myself are victimised. It is no good imagining that just changing the law while leaving the same UK state officers in charge is going to solve this, or any other, problem that besets the British people. Leaving idiots in charge doesn’t work - ever. Tony Blair claimed that the rules had changed. He is wrong. The rule that counts has stayed the same. The rule is that idiots are to be in charge. That now a golden rule as idiot Blair makes way for idiot Brown. There is still an undemocratic United Kingdom, Elizabeth is still the Queen, Brown is still PM, Smith is still Home Secretary, idiot judges still rule the courts and idiot chief constables still rule the police.

Terrorist Anjem Choudary, on BBC Newsnight. 11/08/05 Choudary defends fellow terrorist Omar Bakri Mohammed

Wrong Blair. The rules of the game are still the same – idiots are still in charge.

Our Kirsty is wasting her time as there's no negotiating with that no-good terrorist leader Choudary. He is at war with the British people - and our Kirsty isn't about to offer him a British surrender. He SHOULD soon be a prisoner of war, so that SHOULD be his last appearance in the Newsnight studio. But since when did what-should-be matter to the idiots who run the UK state? Begging her pardon of course but our Kirsty is embarrassing the Scots somewhat by sitting at the same table as that man. Maybe if I sing our Kirsty a wee song, she'll take the hint? "Everybody wants you. Everybody wants your love. I'd just like to make you mine, all mine. ... Kirsty, give it up! Give it up! Kirsty, give it up!" "The Queen of Scots" Kirsty Wark, BBC Newsnight presenter. Music: Give It Up - K.C. & The Sunshine Band

• London bombings: I was handcuffed & jailed for trying to observe a 2 minutes silence for victims
  • Omar Bakri has gone. His fellow terrorists should 'GET TO FOSTOK!'

• London bombings - How do we protect ourselves from attack from within?
  • Blair family policing - if in doubt, blow his brains out

Click here to: War on Terrorism Threats from the U.K. Threats from global reach organisations Blair: the shoulder of a hypocrite For War to Disarm Saddam Condi - You win again Condoleezza Rice on the London bombings Law and order within Scotland To advise Scots about policies, services, strategies and tactics The BBC VE Day Announcement, 7th May 1945 Index, site map and search Return to this Web site's Start Page